FUJ00184492 - Email from Andy Dunks To: Dave Ibbett, Matthew Lenton, Pete Newsome and others re WS for audit data

Evidence on official site

FUJ00184492
FUJ00184492

From: Dunks, Andy[/O=FUJITSU EXCHANGE ORGANIZATION/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE
GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=E4686DC33F 1B43B8B885DC8E6FC]

Sent: Wed 14/11/2018 4:20:53 PM (UTC)

To: Ibbett, Dave __ GR
Newsome, Pete}

Lenton, Matthew, GRO

Cc:
Subject: RE: WS for audit data

I have amended our standard WS form, have removed references to ARQs amongst other things that are not relevant
to the data supplied to you.
So this statement has not been used before in its current form.

Andy

From: Ibbett, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 2:22 PM
To: Lenton, Matthew
Pete
Subject: RE: WS for audit data

unks, Andy Newsome,

Hi Matthew,
It should be able to go as Andy has used that standard form.
Regards,

Dave

From: Lenton, Matthew

}Newsome, Pete! GRO I Ibbett, Dave

Subject: FW: WS for audit data

Andy,
It looks OK to me; it may include more information than is required regarding the solution overview, but looks like it
contains everything they need.

Dave, Pete, OK for this to be sent to WBD, who I expect will remove anything they don’t want and re-template it, or
does it need to go past our legal people first?

I'd explain to them that this is the form of statement that has been used before when providing a witness statements
for prosecutions.

Matthew Lenton
Post Office Account Document Manager
P&PS, Digital Technology Services

Fujitsu

From: Dunks, Andy
FUJ00184492
FUJ00184492

Sent: 14 November 2018 13:38
To: Lenton, Matthew

Cc: Ibbett, Dave { GRO
Subject: WS for a

Hi Matthew,
Attached is a witness statement which I believe covers the data that I supplied to you as a result of your request on
the 34 Oct 2018. Can you let me know if this is suitable.

Thanks,

Andy Dunks
Security Operations Post Office Account
Fujitsu