POL00104107
POL00104107
Message
From: Ken McCall GRO :
on behalf of — Ken McCall1f :
Sent: 22/04/2020 20:
To: Veronica Branton f-
Subject:
Veronica
I would appreciate seeing a redraft of the minutes to include the points raised by Tom
I must say at this stage I do not feel comfortable that the minutes truly reflect the complete unawareness of the
Board to the existence of a Deloitte report, whom it was commissioned by, and the contents therein, and that the
minutes reflect the complete shock at finding out that Fujitsu had remote access. If my memory is correct we
heard this just prior to the Horizon judgement. Again we resolved to find out whom knew about this access and
why it was not made aware to the Board.
Thank you in anticipation of your kind consideration of the above points for the drafting of the minutes
Best regards
Ken
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Veronica Branton ¢_
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 7:
To: Cooper, Tom - UKGI Ken McCall1
Carla Stent1 <7
<4 GRO Lisa Harrington
Subje PDF of CCRC papers 23 April 2020
GRO
Thanks, Tom
T’'ll make those changes.
Best wishes
Veronica
Get Qutlock for i
From: Cooper, Tom - UKGI no
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 7:28:57 PM
To: Veronica Branton
Tim Parker Ken McCall
Carla Stent1
Lisa Harrington
: PDF of CCRC papers 23 April 2020
Zarin Patel
Ben Foat {
POL-0103690
POL00104107
POL00104107
Veronica
I’ve got a few points on the minutes from the last meeting.
In the matters resolved in para 7 it mentions a route map of decisions leading to the GLO and makes specific
reference to who knew about the Deloitte report.
I'd like to clarify that the “who knew about” question should apply to the various pieces of work commissioned:
- following POL’s response to the 2nd Second Sight report
- following termination of the Mediation Scheme
- following the Jonathan Swift QC report
Although not discussed explicitly last week, I hope we can agree also to look at whether recommended actions
(eg by the QCs) were not completed or only partially completed. A good example is the Deloitte report which as
I understand it only addressed the Horizon system since 2010 notwithstanding the QC’s recommendation to
look at remote access over the life of the Horizon system.
I think we also asked Tim to report back on what his recollection is as to what discussions too place with
management - presumably Paula and Jane - regarding which of these matters should be discussed at the Board.
Tom
Sent from my iPhone
On 22 Apr 2020, at 18:20, Veronica Branton <.,
Tom
Please find attached the PDF of the CCRC papers for tomorrow. Password to follow.
Best wishes
Veronica
Veronica Branton
<image001.png> Company Secretary
First Floor,
Finsbury St
don
EC2Y 9AQ
ry Dials
et
See the Company Secretariat Intranet Page for:Post Office Group Board & Committee Dates &
Deadlines,Board Paper Templates & Guidance &Guidance on the Contract Approval Process.
For Contract Approval Form (CAF) enquiries, please emailcaf@postoffice.co.uk
POL-0103690
POL00104107
POL00104107
HEC 2 2 2 2 Rf 00 2 I 0 0 9 0 0 0 fC 0 0 A
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are
not the named recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of
this communication. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender by reply email
and then delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions expressed within this email
are solely those of the sender, unless otherwise specifically stated.
POST OFFICE LIMITED is registered in England and Wales no 2154540. Registered Office:
Finsbury Dials, 20 Finsbury Street, London EC2Y 9AQ.
FEI COR RR OI I ICCC RR RoR I ICCC 2 oR oF ICE oR CCC 2 0R oR R HCES00R oR R CCEE 0 oo
“Post Office Limited is committed to protecting your privacy. Information about how we do this
can be found on our website at www.postoffice.co.uk/privacy”
<20200423_Agenda&Papers_POLBoardCCRC_complete_password.pdf>
re addressed, If you
mail. This footn:
solely for the use of the #
POL-0103690